Sagar Shantilal Karpe v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And ANR.

84 to 86-WP.600.2023+2 jvs

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 600 OF 2023 Pravin Bharat Vasave } Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater } Mumbai & Anr.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 623 OF 2023 Chandrakant Babu Shende } Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater } Mumbai & Anr.

} Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 694 OF 2023 Sagar Shantilal Karpe } Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater } Mumbai & Anr.

} Respondents Mr. M. D. Lonkar with Ms. A. M. Lonkar and Mr. O. M. Lonkar for the petitioners.

Mr. Burhan B ukhari with Ms. Shilpa Redkar for MCGM in WP/694/2023 & WP/600/2023.

Mr. B. D. Birajdar with Ms. Shilpa Redkar and Ms. Komal Deshmukh for MCGM in WP/623/2023.

CORAM:

S. V. GANGAPURWALA, Act.CJ.& SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.

DATE:

MARCH 21, 2023 P.C.:

1.

The petitioners are challenging the orders of suspension. 2.

We have heard the learned advocate for the petitioner and SALUNKE J V the learned advocate for the respondents.

by SALUNKE J V Date: 2023.03.23 14:52:30 +0530

84 to 86-WP.600.2023+2 3.

The learned advocate for the respondents submits that on 17th February 2023, the written say has been filed by the petitioners. The inquiry is concluded and now only the inquiry report is to be received.

4.

Naturally, the order of suspension would be subject to the decision that would be taken on the departmental proceedings. The respondents shall conclude the departmental proceedings within two months from today, failing which, the suspension orders would stand revoked.

5.

With the aforesaid direction, the writ petitions are disposed of. No costs.

(SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE)