Devkinandan Mithailal Pasi And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And 5 Others

spb/ 41wp2556-16.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2556 OF 2016 Mr. Devkinandan Mithailal Pasi & Anr.

... Petitioners.

V/s.

The State of Maharashtra & 5 Ors.

... Respondents.

--- Mr. Vincent D'Silva, Advocate for the Petitioners. Ms. Uma Palsuledesai, AGP for the Respondent Nos.1 & 4. Mr. Yogesth Patil i/by Mr. Vijay Patil, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 & 3.

Mr. R. P. Ojha, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 5 & 6. --- CORAM : V. M. KANADE AND P.R. BORA, JJ.

DATE : 08th FEBRUARY, 2017 P.C. :

The learned counsel appearing on behalf of the Slum Rehabilitation Authority submits that the Petitioners have an alternate efficacious remedy available of filing an appeal against the impugned order before the tribunal. Learned counsel appearing for the Petitioners submits that in any case, he will be preferring an appeal expeditiously. If such an appeal is filed within two weeks, the same may be considered on merits and in accordance with the law. Borey 1/2

spb/ 41wp2556-16.odt If an application for stay is filed, the same shall be decided, after hearing the parties expeditiously, within two weeks thereafter, So far as prayer clause (b) is concerned, the petitioners have a remedy of approaching the other appropriate forum.

Reserving the said right, the writ petition is disposed of.

( P.R. BORA, J) (V.M.KANADE, J) .....

Borey 2/2