Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Shree Trikur Industries

907-COMS15-16.DOC SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL SUIT NO. 15 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ...Plaintiffs

Versus

Shree Trikur Industries ...Defendants Mr. Nikhil Sharma, a/w Ms. Niyati Davawala, i/b W. S. Kane, for the Plaintiffs.

Ms. Tanuja Liman, i/b Parwez Sidiqui, for the Defendants. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

29th July 2016 PC:- 1.

The Constituted Attorney of the Defendant is present in Court. He has instructions to submit to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Mr. Sharma for the Plaintiff does not, therefore, press his prayer for damages. 2.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

29th July 2016

907-COMS15-16.DOC 3.

The Court Receiver had seized certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks from today.

4.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

5.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 29th July 2016