← Library
Bombay High CourtS/696/2016consent term

Usv Private Limited v. Alwin Wilcure Pharmaceuticals And ANR

2016-09-29Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

903-S-696-2016.DOC JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 696 OF 2016 USV Private Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

Alwin Wilcure Pharmaceuticals and Another ...Defendants Ms. Pooja Kshirsagar, i/b Bharat Shah and Company for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Amogh K. Karandikar, for the Defendants.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

29th September 2016 PC:- 1.

The Suit is settled. The Consent Terms are tendered. I have seen the Consent Terms. These are signed by the Senior Deputy General Manager of the Plaintiffs and a Partner of Defendant No.1. The other partners have also signed., as have the Advocates for the parties.

2.

The Consent Terms are in order. They are not contrary to law. They appear to have been drawn by the parties of their own volition and reflect their true intentions.

29th September 2016

903-S-696-2016.DOC 3.

The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms, particularly those in clause 8, are accepted as undertakings to the Court. 4.

The Suit is disposed in accordance with the Consent Terms. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules. Drawn up decree / order is dispensed with.

5.

All interim proceedings are infructuous and are disposed as such.

6.

Defendant No.2 is from Himachal Pradesh. A Vakalatnama signed by him has been couriered to the Advocates in Bombay. They will file that Vakalatnama in the Registry on or before 7th October 2016.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 29th September 2016