← Library
Bombay High CourtS/627/2016consent term

Hindustan Unilever Limited v. Vimali Soap Industries

2016-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

904-S627-16.DOC SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 627 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 1759 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ... Plaintiffs

Versus

Vimali Soap Industries ... Defendant Mr. Akshata Kamath,with Ms. Niyati J., i/b W.S. Kane and Company for the Plaintiffs.

Mr. Purshottam Chavan, for the Defendant.

Mr. Vijay B. Bhingare, Proprietor of the Defendant. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

2nd August 2016 PC:- 1.

Mr. Vijay B. Bhingare, proprietor of the Defendant is present in Court. He is represented by Mr. Chavan today. He submits to a decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d). Ms. Kamath, therefore, does not presses the prayer for damages. 2.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

2nd August 2016

904-S627-16.DOC 3.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks.

4.

The Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of sixteen weeks from today.

5.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

6.

Notice of Motion No. 1759 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

7.

Mr. Chavan undertakes to file his vakalatnama within a period of one week from today.

8.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 2nd August 2016