Pankaj Investments v. Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax - 16(3)

Rane 1/1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO. 1224 OF 2016 Pankaj Investments, Mumbai .....Appellant V/s.

Additional Commissioner of Income Tax-16(3), Mumbai ....Respondent **** Mr. Sameer Dalal, Advocate for the appellant. None for the respondent.

CORAM : AKIL KURESHI, & CORAM : AKIL KURESHI, & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

Monday, 28 Monday, 28th th January, 2019.

January, 2019.

P.C. :

P.C. :

1.

1.

Learned Counsel Mr. Sumeet Dalal, appearing for the appellant states that, despite best efforts, he has no instructions from the appellant. The Income Tax Appeal is dismissed for want of instructions.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J) (AKIL KURESHI, J)