Ms. Louise Dorothy Crasto v. The State Of Maharashtra And 6 ORS.

25-WP.2473.2013.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2473 OF 2013 Ms. Louise Dorothy Crasto } Petitioner versus The State of Maharashtra } and Ors.

} Respondents Mr. Abhishekh Khare i/b. M/s. Khare Legal chambers for the Petitioner.

Ms. Akshita Mehta i/b. M/s. Thakordas and Co. for Respondent No. 3.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & M. S. SONAK, JJ.

DATED :- FEBRUARY 12, 2016 P.C. :- It appears that on 27th March, 2014, the present set of Advocates informed the Registry and in the presence of the Petitioner that they do not desire to continue as the Advocates. There is a record of this by the Additional Prothonotary and Senior Master.

2) The dispute in relation to payment of fees is outside the purview of the Additional Prothonotary and Senior Master. Equally, if the Petitioner, who has filed the Writ Petition does not wish to continue with the Petition or is not present despite the above development, then, it is for him to suffer. The Advocates J.V.Salunke,PA

25-WP.2473.2013.doc cannot complain if we dismiss the Petition for want of prosecution for, all remedies to recover the fees and in accordance with law are available and intact. The Petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.

(M.S.SONAK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA