← Library
Bombay High CourtCHS/712/2017disposed off

Nandkishore Lalbhai Mehta And ANR v. Tejraj G Gowani And 5 ORS And Malka Bhavesh Shah And 2 ORS (Respondents)

2017-08-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice K.R. Shriram2 pages

2.s.1046.1992==.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT NO. 1046 OF 1992 Shree Giriraj Construction Co.

...Plaintiff

Versus

Nandkishore Holdings & Construction Co. Ltd. & Ors.

...Defendants WITH SUIT NO. 3294 OF 1992 Nand Kishore L. Mehta & Anr.

...Plaintiffs

Versus

Tejraj G. Gowani ...Defendants WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 712 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO. 3294 OF 1992 Nand Kishore L. Mehta & Anr.

...Plaintiffs

Versus

Tejraj G. Gowani ...Defendants And Malka Bhavesh Shah & Ors.

.. Respondents Mr.Nishant Sasidharan a/w. Mr.Vasim Shaikh i/b Pravin Mehta and Mithi and Co. for plaintiffs in both suits.

Mr.Prantik Majumdar i/b M/s. M.P. Savla and Co. for defendant No.1 in S/1046/1992 and for defendant nos.1 to 5 in S/3294/1992. Ms. Sheeja John i/b Nipa Gupte for defendant No.6 in S/3294/1992. CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 1ST AUGUST 2017 P.C.

CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 712 OF 2017 The chamber summons is taken out to bring on record the legal heirs Shraddha Talekar PS 1/2

2.s.1046.1992==.doc of plaintiff no.1 who expired on 15.02.2017. The legal heirs of plaintiff no.1 are plaintiff no.2 and respondents. The applicant seeks deletion of name of plaintiff no.1 in the cause title and add respondents as plaintiff no.1A, 1B and 1C. Mr.Majumdar for defendant Nos.1 to 5 and Ms.Seeja John for defendant No.6 have no objection if the relief sought in chamber summons is granted.

Therefore, the chamber summons is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) and accordingly disposed.

By consent, suits be listed on 22nd August 2017 for issues on which date parties to come with agreed draft issues. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Shraddha Talekar PS 2/2