Principal Commissioner Of Income Tax-Central-1 v. Jitendra M. Doshi

Priya Soparkar 65,69 to 71, 73 itxa 730-16-o IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.730 OF 2016 The Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-14 ... Appellant V/s.

Shri Minesh D. Shah ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1572 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1579 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1581 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1585 OF 2016 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1622 OF 2016 Pr.Commissioner of Income Tax-Central-1.

... Appellant V/s.

Shri Jitendra M. Doshi ... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.41 OF 2018 WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.166 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax, Central-1.

... Appellant V/s.

Rolta Shares & Stocks P. Ltd.

... Respondent WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1189 OF 2018 Pr. Commissioner of Income-Tax-11 ... Appellant V/s.

Rustomjee Buildcon Pvt. Ltd.

... Respondent

Priya Soparkar 65,69 to 71, 73 itxa 730-16-o --- Mr.Suresh Kumar for the Appellants.

Mr.Sameer Dalal i/by Mr.Sudhakar Lakhani for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.1572 of 2016, 1579 of 2016, 1581 of 2016, 1585 of 2016 and 1622 of 2016.

Mr.Atul Jasani for the Respondent in ITXA Nos.41 of 2018 and 166 of 2018.

--- CORAM : AKIL KURESHI AND SANDEEP K. SHINDE, JJ.

DATE : JANUARY 28, 2019.

P.C.:- 1.

These Appeals under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (the Act) challenge the orders passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (the Tribunal).

2.

Mr.Suresh Kumar, learned Counsel appearing for the Revenue states that he has been instructed not to press these appeals. This for the reason that the tax effect in each of these appeals is less than Rs.50 lakhs as provided in CBDT Circular No.3 of 2018 dated 11th July, 2018.

3.

Accordingly, all these Appeals are dismissed as not pressed. 4.

Refund of Court Fees, as per Rules.

(SANDEEP K. SHINDE,J.) (AKIL KURESHI,J.)