Maharastra Cycling Association And ANR v. The Union Of India And 5 ORS

4-WP1678-15.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1678 OF 2015 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 304 OF 2015 Maharashtra Cycling Association & Anr.

...Petitioners

Versus

The Union of India & 5 Ors.

...Respondents

Mr. Sameer M. Tendulkar, for the Petitioners. Mr. D.A. Dube, i/b Mr. Neeraj Kumar, for the Union of IndiaRespondent Nos. 1 and 2. CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & G.S. PATEL, JJ.

DATED:

11th January 2016 PC:- 1.

Learned Advocate appearing for the Petitioners has placed before us a copy of the report dated 10th January 2016 which indicates that the elections were held.

2.

We do not think that the Petitioners are without any remedy. In the event the elections held are allegedly not legal and valid, then the Petitioners can question the entire process, including the results thereof in appropriate proceedings. They can approach an appropriate forum for redressal of all their grievances. Finding that

4-WP1678-15.DOC the Writ Petition is not the remedy, we dispose it of with the above observations. We clarify that we have not examined any contentions on merit.

3.

In view of disposal of the Writ Petition, nothing survives in the Chamber Summons and the same is disposed of as infructuous. (G. S. PATEL, J.) (S. C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)