National Conductors And ANR v. Commissioner Of Central Excise

suresh 25-NMAG-1693.2016.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1693 OF 2016 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1524 OF 2015 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.363 OF 2014 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1524 OF 2015 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.363 OF 2014 {Taken on Board} National Condutors & Anr.

.... Applicants In the matter between National Condutors & Anr.

.... Appellants Vs.

Commissioner of Central Excise & Service Tax, Daman .... Respondent Mr. Vagish K. Singh i/by Mr. Shivam Singh for the Applicants/Appellants.

Mr. Swapnil Bangur for the Respondent.

CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH D. NAIK, JJ.

DATE : APRIL 17, 2017 P.C:

1.

Having heard both sides and finding that there is

suresh 25-NMAG-1693.2016.doc sufficient cause for the absence of the Advocate, we set aside the order dismissing the Notice of Motion No.1524 of 2015 for default.

2.

That motion stands restored to file.

3.

By consent of both the Advocates, we place the Notice of Motion No.1524 of 2015 on today's board. 4.

Having found that there was a delay of 27 days which has occurred unintentionally and there are no mala fides, we condone the delay. Thus, the delay of 27 days in filing the appeal is condoned. The appeal shall now be registered and placed for admission in ordinary course.

5.

The Notice of Motion No.1524 of 2015 accordingly stands disposed of.

(PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)