Bombay High CourtCEXA/65/2004withdrawn

The Commissioner Of Central Excise Mumbai-V v. M/S. Chandralok Fabrics

2016-07-04Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Dr. Shalini Phansalkar-Joshi,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Dharmadhikari3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CENTRAL EXCISE APPEALN NO. 65 OF 2004 The Commissioner of Central } Excise, Mumbai - V } Appellant versus M/s. Chandralok Fabrics } Respondent WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 67 OF 2006 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 36 OF 2007 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 113 OF 2007 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 210 OF 2007 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 50 OF 2011 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 91 OF 2012 WITH CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL NO. 163 OF 2013 WITH CUSTOMS APPEAL NO. 98 OF 2007 Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the appellant in Central Excise Appeal Nos. 65/2004, 67/2004, 36/2007, 210/2007, 91/2012, 163/2013.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the appellant in CUAPP/98/2007.

Mr. A. S. Rao for the appellant in CEXA/113/2007.

Ms. S. I. Shah i/b. M/s. S. I. Shah and Co.

for the appellant in CEXA/50/2011.

Mr. R. V. Shetty with Mr. K. R. Chaudhari for the respondent in CEXA/65/2004.

Mr. Durgesh H. Nadkarni for the respondent in CUAPP/98/2007.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, JJ.

DATED :- JULY 4, 2016 P.C. :- The learned counsel appearing for the appellants/Revenue, on instructions, state that the Revenue maybe allowed to withdraw these appeals. They are withdrawn in the light of the circular issued by the Revenue which determines the limit of monetary sums or the sum above which alone the appeals of the Revenue are to be pressed. Every appeal involving a sum mentioned below this limit would not be pressed and on the Revenue's request, the court may dismiss it as withdrawn. 2) We have found that the Revenue is withdrawing the appeals though admitted on substantial questions of law. It is for the Revenue to decide and withdraw the appeals based on its circular, but we clarify that we have expressed no opinion on the questions of law nor on the legality and validity of the circular.

3) By clarifying as above, all the above appeals are allowed to be withdrawn and stand disposed of as such. (DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.)