Mohammed Usman Islam Qureshi v. The Collector Of Mumbai And 7 ORS.

901-WP.1605.2017.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1605 OF 2017 Mohammed Usman Islam Qureshi } Petitioner versus The Collector of Mumbai and Ors. } Respondents Mr. Mohanish Chaudhari for the petitioner.

Mr. Manish Upadhye-AGP for respondent nos. 1 and 2.

Mr. S. A. Patil for respondent no. 3.

Mr. Rohan Mahadik i/b. M/s. The Juris Partners for respondent no. 8.

Mr. Mahesh Ingale-Superintendent of Land Records, Mumbai present.

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & PRAKASH. D. NAIK, JJ.

DATED :- MARCH 27, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

The request in this petition is to direct a joint demarcation of the property, more particularly described in the petition so that the issue of overlapping boundaries can be resolved. 2.

The petition was adjourned earlier to enable Mr. Upadhye learned AGP to take instructions. In the presence of the second respondent, Mr. Upadhye informs the court that within a period J.V.Salunke,PA

901-WP.1605.2017.doc of two weeks from today, at the site, this demarcation will be carried out. We accept this statement as an undertaking given to this court. Since the demarcation is to be carried out after due notice and in the presence of all the parties, each one of them can reserve their contentions and for being raised in appropriate proceedings, but assist the second respondent to at least complete the exercise in terms of the undertaking given to this court. 3.

With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition is disposed of. We clarify that, this court has expressed no opinion on the rival contentions.

(PRAKASH.D.NAIK, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) J.V.Salunke,PA