The Commissioner Of Income Tax 17 Mumbai v. Anuradha D. Pendse

ITXA3635.09

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3635 OF 2009 Commissioner of Income Tax-17, Mumbai 400 012 ... Appellant v/s Ms Anuradha D. Pendse, Mumbai 400 014 ... Respondent Mr Ashok Kotangale for Appellant.

Mr Jitendra Singh for Respondent.

CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA AND B.P. COLABAWALLA JJ.

DATE : 26 th FEBRUARY, 2016 P.C.:- 1.

This Appeal relates to Assessment Year 1998-99. Mr Suresh Kumar, learned counsel for the Revenue states that the tax effect in the present Appeal as indicated in para 11 of the Appeal Memos is Rs.3.86 lakhs. He further states that in view of the Central Board of Direct Tax Circular No.21/15 dated 10th December 2015, the tax effect being less than the threshold limit of Rs.20 lakhs provided therein for challenging an order of the Tribunal before this Court, he does not press the present 1/2 VRD

ITXA3635.09 Appeal.

2.

Accordingly, the Appeal is dismissed as not pressed. Refund of Court fees as per Rules.

(B.P.COLABAWALLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.) 2/2 VRD