Ravindra Narayan Ghude v. Jayprakash Narayan Ghude And 5 ORS.

35-NMT239-17.DOC Atul

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 239 OF 2017 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1672 OF 2017 Ravindra Narayan Ghude

...Petitioner

Versus

Jayprakash Narayan Ghude & Ors

...Respondents

Mr Amit Potnis, i/b Tamhane & Co., for the Respondents.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

11th September 2018 PC:- 1.

None for the Petitioner. In view of the settled law on the subject, 1 the Notice of Motion is not maintainable. It is dismissed. Rupali Mehta v Tina Narinder Sain Mehta, AIR 2007 Bom 62 : 2006 (6) ALL MR 48 : 2006 (6) Bom CR 778 : 2006 (6) Mh LJ 786; Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande alias Handege v Vithalrao Hande & Ors, AIR 2011 Bom 136 : 2011 (4) ALL MR 189 : 2011 (4) Bom CR 326 : 2011 (113) Bom LR 1302 : 2011 (4) Mh LJ 50; Manek Dara Sukhadwalla v Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer (DB), MANU/MH/1252/2014; Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer & Anr v Manek Dara Sukhadwalla and Anr; 2015 (2) ALL MR 233 : 2014 (2) Bom CR 591 : 2015 (2) MhLJ 917; Lydia Agnes Rodriques née D'Cunha & Ors v Joseph Anthony D'Cunha & Ors, 2014 (2) ALLMR 873 : 2014 (1) Bom CR 811 : 2014 (3) Mh LJ 508.

11th September 2018

35-NMT239-17.DOC 2.

Liberty to the Petitioner to make an application for appropriate reliefs in a fresh proceeding.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 11th September 2018