Hidustan Unilever Limited v. Sumeru Industries

910-NMSL1866-16.DOC SHEPHALI

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION SUIT (L) NO. 668 OF 2016 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 1866 OF 2016 Hindustan Unilever Limited ... Plaintiff

Versus

Sumeru Industries ... Defendants Ms. Akshata Kamath, i/b W.S. Kane and Company for the Plaintiff. Mr. Ragani Shantilal, proprietor of the Defendants is present. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

27th July 2016 PC:- 1.

Mr. Ragani Shantilal, a partner of the Defendants, who is personally present in Court, submits to the decree in terms of prayer clauses (a), (b) and (d) of the Suit. Ms. Kamath for the Plaintiffs therefore, does not press the prayer for damages. 2.

The Suit is decreed in these terms with no order as to costs. Drawn up decree is dispensed with. Refund of Court Fees, if any, in accordance with the Rules.

27th July 2016

910-NMSL1866-16.DOC 3.

The Court Receiver had sealed certain goods. These are to be destroyed by the Defendants at their cost within a period of 12 weeks.

4.

The Defendant will file an Affidavit of compliance within a period of sixteen weeks from today.

5.

The Court Receiver stands discharged without passing accounts but on payment of his costs, charges and expenses within four weeks from today by the Plaintiffs.

6.

Notice of Motion (L) No. 1866 of 2016 does not survive and is disposed of accordingly.

7.

All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this Order. (G. S. PATEL, J.) 27th July 2016