Nakul Kashinath Bhoir And ORS. v. Ravindra Pandharinath Ulvekar And ORS. And Dharmesh Jain And 2 ORS (Applicants)

975-CHS-1350-2016.DOC JSN

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1350 OF 2016 IN SUIT NO. 4307 OF 1986 Dharmesh Jain and others ...Applicants In the matter between Nakul Kashinath Bhoir and others ... Plaintiffs

Versus

Ravindra Pandhrinath Ulvekar and others ...Defendants Mr. G.T. Kanchanpurkar, for the Plaintiffs.

Mr. Jay Vakil, i/b MDP and Partners for the Applicants.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

19th December 2016 PC:- 1.

This Chamber Summons filed by Defendants Nos. 11, 12 and 14 is for leave to file an Additional Written Statement. The reason given is that these Defendants inadvertently omitted mention of certain crucial facts in the Written Statement that they have already filed. These facts include mention of Consent Terms taken on 19th March 2003 in a Company Application and a reference to certain Land Revenue Records.

2.

The Additional Written Statement is in fact ready. It has been affirmed. It is shown to me. I will the allow Additional Written 19th December 2016

975-CHS-1350-2016.DOC Statement. Not to do so would, in my view, prejudice these Defendants and possibly the trial of the Suit. 3.

The Chamber Summons is made absolute in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

4.

The Additional Written Statement is to be filed in the Registry.

(G. S. PATEL, J.) 19th December 2016