The Commissioner Of Central Excise v. Sahajanand Laser Technology Pvt.Ltd.

27. nma 497-18.doc DDR

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 497 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL ST. NO. 133 OF 2014 The Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Daman ...Applicant

IN THE MATTER BETWEEN

The Commissioner of Central GST & Central Excise, Daman ...Appellant vs.

Sahajanand Laser Technology Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent

...........

Ms. P.S. Cardozo for the applicant/org. Appellant. ...........

CORAM : NITIN JAMDAR & M.S.KARNIK, JJ.

DATE : 27 FEBRUARY 2020 P.C.:- Heard the learned counsel for the Applicant/original Appellant.

2.

Delay of one day in filing this Appeal is sought to be condoned. In affidavit in support, the reasons are given in paragraphs 1 and 2, which we find sufficient. 1/2

27. nma 497-18.doc 3.

Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (b). Notice of Motion is accordingly, disposed of. 4.

The learned counsel for the Applicant/original Appellant states that she has received instructions to withdraw this appeal as the tax effect involved in this appeal is below the limits stipulated in the Circular dated 22 August 2019 issued by the Central Board of Indirect Taxes and Customs.

5.

The Appeal is accordingly, disposed of as withdrawn. (M.S.KARNIK, J.) (NITIN JAMDAR, J.) Digitally signed by Diksha Rane Date:

2020.02.28 13:25:13 +0530 Diksha Rane 2/2