Sangita Jhunjhunwala And ANR. v. Bank Of Baroda And 16 ORS.

by GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD Date:

2022.07.02 16:08:51 +0530 GAURI AMIT GAEKWAD 1/2 18.WP-3203-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.3203 OF 2018 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO.532 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.3203 OF 2018 Sangita Jhunjhunwala and Anr.

....Petitioners V/s.

Bank of Baroda and Ors.

....Respondents ---- Mr. Akshay S. Malviya a/w. Mr. Kailash Baug for petitioners. Mr. A.S. Ramesan for respondent no.1.

Mr. Shamrao B. Gore, AGP for respondent nos.6, 7 and 15 for State. Ms. Tejashree Choudhari i/b. Intralegal for respondent no.9. Ms. Sunitha Perumal i/b. Mr. Sachin V. Masurkar for respondent no.13. ---- CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 1st JULY 2022 P.C. :

Mr. Malviya seeks leave of the Court to withdraw the petition with liberty to file a fresh petition because various events have transpired after the petition was filed which would require extensive amendment to the petition. The counsels for respondents state that if the Court is inclined to grant the liberty, then all their rights and contentions including on maintainability of the fresh petition should be kept open. The counsels for respondents are justified in making this statement. Therefore, petition dismissed as withdrawn with the liberty as prayed for. All rights and contentions of respondents including Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 18.WP-3203-2018.doc maintainability of the new petition is kept open. Interim application, if any, also stands disposed.

(MILIND N. JADHAV, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad