← Library
Bombay High CourtMPT/92/2014consent term

Dr.(Mrs.)Pooja Narendrakumar Parmar v. Priyanka Karan Bhaskar @ Jasmine Narendrakumar Parmar

2015-10-30Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

P5-MPT-92-14-.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 92 OF 2014 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1562 OF 2013 Dr. (Mrs.) Pooja Narendrakumar Parmar

...Petitioner

Versus

Mrs. Priyanka Karan Bhaskar nee Miss. Priyanka alias Jasmine Narendrakumar Parmar.

...Respondent.

Mr. P.S. Gidwani, for the Petitioner.

Mr. D. Shah, i/b M/s. Lilani Shah & Co., for the Respondent. CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

30th October 2015 PC:- 1.

Not on board. Mentioned. By consent taken on board. 2.

The Miscellaneous Petition is settled. Consent Terms are tendered. These are signed by the Petitioner, the Respondent and their respective Advocates. Both parties are present in Court. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

P5-MPT-92-14-.DOC 3.

The Miscellaneous Petition is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms, with no order as to costs. 4.

In consequence, all ad-interim orders are vacated forthwith. (G. S. PATEL, J.)