← Library
Bombay High CourtCSD/628/2015absolute

Writer Business Services Pvt. Ltd. v. -

2015-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice S.C. Gupte3 pages

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMPANY SUMMONS FOR DIRECTION NO.628 OF 2015 In the matter of the Companies Act, 1 of 1956 and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013;

AND In the matter of Sections 391 to 394 of the Companies Act, 1956 and other relevant provisions of the Companies Act, 2013;

AND In the matter of Scheme of Arrangement between P N WRITER & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED (the Demerged Company) and WRITER BUSINESS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED (the Resulting Company) WRITER BUSINESS SERVICES ) PRIVATE LIMITED, a company ) incorporated under the Companies Act, ) 1956 having its registered office at Plot ) No. 105, Dr Babasaheb Ambedkar Road, ) Lalbaug, Mumbai - 400 033.

) ...Applicant Company.

Called Summons for Direction for hearing Mr. Rajesh Shah i/b M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant Coram: S. C. Gupte, J.

Date: 31st July, 2015 MINUTES OF THE ORDER UPON the application of the Applicant Company above named by a Summons for Direction AND UPON HEARING Mr. Rajesh Shah instructed by M/s. Rajesh Shah & Co., Advocate for the Applicant Company, AND UPON READING the Affidavit dated 16th June, 2015 Mr. Yazdi Desai, Director of the Applicant Company, in support of the Summons for Direction and the Exhibit therein referred to, IT IS ORDERED:- 1.

That the convening and holding the meeting of the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company for the purpose of considering and, if thought fit, approving, with or without modification(s) the proposed Scheme of Arrangement between P N WRITER & COMPANY PRIVATE LIMITED, the Demerged Company and WRITER BUSINESS SERVICES PRIVATE LIMITED, the Resulting Company is dispensed with in view of the consent given by both the Equity Shareholders of the Applicant Company, which are annexed as Exhibit 'C-1' and 'C-2' to the Affidavit in support of Summons for Direction.

2.

That the question of convening and holding of the meeting of Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors does not arise since there are no Secured Creditors and Unsecured Creditors of the Applicant Company as stated in paragraph 26 of the Affidavit in support of Summons for Direction.

(S. C. Gupte, J.)