Bvg Krystal Joint Venture v. The State Of Maharashtra

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION MAHARASHTRA VALUE ADDED TAX NO.48 OF 2016 IN VAT APPEAL NO.319 OF 2014 ALONG WITH MAHARASHTRA VALUE ADDED TAX NO.49 OF 2016 IN VAT APPEAL NO.318 OF 2014 ALONG WITH MAHARASHTRA VALUE ADDED TAX NO.50 OF 2016 IN VAT APPEAL NO.317 OF 2014 BVG Krystal Joint Venture .. Appellant Vs.

The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent Mr. Parth Badheka, i/by Ms. Nikita Badheka, for the Appellant. Mr. Himanshu B. Takke, AGP for the Respondent-State. CORAM : DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR & VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J.J.

TH SEPTEMBER, 2022.

DATE : 27 P.C. :

1.

Learned counsel for the appellant, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw these Appeals in terms of the remedy under the Maharashtra Settlement of Arrears Tax, Interest, Penalty or Late Fee Act, 2022. 2.

Accordingly, all the three Appeals are dismissed as withdrawn. Refund of court fees, if any, as per rules.

[ VALMIKI SA MENEZES, J. ] [ DHIRAJ SINGH THAKUR, J. ] 1/1 by SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT Date:

2022.09.29 14:21:27 +0530 SNEHA ABHAY DIXIT 904 to 906-MVXA-48-2016 & MVXA-49-2016 & MVXA-50-2016.doc Dixit