The Commissioner Of Service Tax, Mumbai - Vii Commissionerate (Applicant) v. Reliance Communication Ltd.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1758 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.90 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs.
M/s. Reliance Communication Ltd.
.... Respondent AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.1931 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.97 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs.
M/s. Reliance Communication Infrastructure Ltd.
.... Respondent AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2142 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.164 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2143 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.163 OF 2016
AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2145 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.159 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2151 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.158 OF 2016 AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2154 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.160 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs.
M/s. Reliance Communication Ltd.
.... Respondent AND NOTICE OF MOTION NO.2152 OF 2016 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL {L} NO.236 OF 2016 The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of Service Tax, Mumbai-VII Commissionerate .... Appellant Vs.
M/s. Reliance Infocomm Ltd.
.... Respondent
Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly with Mr. Jitendra B. Mishra for the Applicant/Appellant in all NMAs.
Mr. Jitendra Motwani i/by M/s. Economic Laws Practice for the Respondent in all NMAs.
CORAM: S.C. DHARMADHIKARI & B.P. COLABAWALLA, JJ.
DATE : DECEMBER 19, 2016 P.C:
Having heard both sides and finding that there is a sufficient cause for the delay, the notices of motion are made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). No costs. (B.P. COLABAWALLA, J.) (S.C. DHARMADHIKARI, J.)