Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited v. Ridge Innovation Private Ltd.

P2-COMEX-1642-18-II.doc Sharayu Khot.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN COMMERCIAL DIVISION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO. 1642 OF 2018 IN ARBITRATION NO. 1378 OF 1999 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 1629 OF 2018 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1370 OF 2018 WITH CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 1282 OF 2018 Kotak Mahindra Bank Limited ...Plaintiff

Versus

Ridge Innovation Pvt.Ltd.

...Defendant ---------- Ms. Nikita Pawar, i/by S.I. Joshi, for the Plaintiff. Ms. Shamima Taly, i/by S. Mohamedbhai & Co., for the Defendant.

---------- CORAM :

R.I. CHAGLA J.

DATE : 8 July 2019 ORDER :

1.

Not on board. Taken on board by way of praecipe. 1 / 2 July 8, 2019

P2-COMEX-1642-18-II.doc 2.

The learned Counsel for the Decree-holder tenders the Consent Terms arrived at between the Decree-holder and the Defendants and which has been filed in the Execution Application No. 1642 of 2018.

3.

Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification.

4.

As per the Consent Terms, the Execution Application and all pending Chamber Summonses connected thereto including the Affidavits filed by the Affidavit in Reply in this Court stands dismissed as withdrawn under Clause 3(ii)(f) of the Consent Terms.

5.

Application is accordingly, disposed of.

[R.I. CHAGLA J.] This order is corrected/modified as per speaking to the minutes of the order dated 21.08.2019.

2 / 2 July 8, 2019