Rasi Agriculture And Construction Equipments And 2 ORS v. Case New Holland Construction Equipments (India) Pvt. Ltd.

Rane * 1/2 * Thursday,27.10.2016 sr.no.904

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 969 OF 2016 ALONGWITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1990 OF 2016 IN ARBITRATION PETITION NO. 969 OF 2016 Rasi Agriculture and Construction Equipments and 2 Ors.

.....Petitioners V/s.

Case New Holland Construction Equipments (India) Pvt. Ltd .....Respondent * * * * * * Ms. Sonu Tandon, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Anand Poojari, i/by. S.I. Joshi & Co., Advocate for the respondent.

CORAM :- SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J.

DATED :- 27TH OCTOBER, 2016.

P.C. :- 1).

In this petition filed under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, the parties tender minutes of the order signed by the respective Advocates for remand of the matter to another Arbitrator i.e. Advocate Mikhail Behl. The minutes of the order are

Rane * 2/2 * Thursday,27.10.2016 sr.no.904 taken on file and marked "X" for identification. Mr. Poojari, the learned Advocate appearing for the respondent, tenders the disclosure statement under Section 11(8) read with 12(1) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act issued by the proposed Arbitrator, Mr. Mikhail Behl. The same is taken on file and marked "X1" for identification. In view of the disclosure statement, the appointment of Mr. Mikhail Behl, as the Arbitrator is confirmed. The Arbitration Petition is disposed off in terms of the minutes filed. 2).

In view of disposal of the Arbitration Petition, the Notice of Motion does not survive. The same is accordingly disposed off. (SMT. R.P. SONDURBALDOTA, J)