Dhirajlal Bhanji Gangar v. M.H.A.D.A. And 6 ORS.

Priya 1 wp 1901-16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1901 OF 2016 Dhirajlal Bhanji Gangar ... Petitioner vs.

M.H.A.D.A. and ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1902 OF 2016 Dnyaneshwar Pandurang Parab ... Petitioner vs.

M.H.A.D.A. and ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1903 OF 2016 Akbarali Fakruddin Ujjainwala ... Petitioner vs.

M.H.A.D.A. and ors.

... Respondents WITH WRIT PETITION (LODGING) NO.1925 OF 2016 Ratanlal Jain ... Petitioner vs.

M.H.A.D.A. and ors.

... Respondents .....

Mr.Kalpesh Joshi i/b Mr. Khan Javed Akhtar for Petitioners. Mr.V.P.Sawant for Respondent Nos.1 to 3.

Ms. Kejali Mastakar for Respondent No.4 /BMC. Mr.Sanjay Jain with Mr. Sharad Wakchoure i/b Kishore Thakordas and Company for Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

.....

Priya 2 wp 1901-16 CORAM : S.C. GUPTE, J.

DATE : JULY 29, 2016 P.C. :

1.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

2.

The parties have tendered Minutes of Order duly signed by the Petitioners and Respondent No. 6 and also Advocates for the Petitioners and Respondent Nos. 5 and 6. The minutes are not signed by Respondent Nos.1 to 4, who are State authorities/ Municipal Corporation. The minutes need not be signed by these authorities, since no relief is granted directly against the State in accordance with the minutes. 3.

Learned Counsel seek the disposal of the petitions in terms of the minutes. The minutes are taken on record and marked as Ex.X. The statements and undertakings contained therein are accepted. Petitions are disposed of in terms of the minutes. No order as to costs. 4.

This order is passed in the presence of the Petitioners and Respondent Nos.5 and 6.

( S.C.GUPTE J. )