Dipti Mahesh Manek v. Mahesh Khimji Manek

16-JOT-87-2021 IN TP-967-2018.DOC Ashwini

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION JUDGE'S ORDER NO. 87 OF 2021 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO 967 OF 2018 Dipti Mahesh Manek

...Petitioner

Versus

Mahesh Khimji Manek

...Respondent

Mr Sanjay Manek, for the Petitioner.

CORAM:G.S. PATEL, J DATED: 17th September 2021 PC:- 1.

The Petitioner is personally present in Court. She has affirmed a further Affidavit of 26th August 2021. In paragraph 4 of this Affidavit, which is in support of the Judge's Order, she confirms that the proposed sale of the flat in question is for legal necessity and for the evident advantage of the minor son within the meaning of Section 8(iv) of the Hindu Minority and Guardianship Act. by ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH Date:

2021.09.18 15:07:37 +0530 2.

In view of this statement, and in view of what is stated in the ASHWINI HULGOJI GAJAKOSH first Affidavit in support of the Judge's Order (affirmed on 8th July 2021), the Judge's Order is separately signed. 17th September 2021

16-JOT-87-2021 IN TP-967-2018.DOC 3.

of this order.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 17th September 2021