Jignesh P.Shah v. The Securities And Exchange Board Of India

hcs 1/2 10.ia1866.21.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO.1866 OF 2021 IN WRIT PETITION NO.363 OF 2014 Jignesh P. Shah ... Applicant.

In the matter between Jignesh P. Shah ... Petitioner V/s.

Securities and Exchange Board of India ... Respondent MR. Prakash Shah with Ms.Namita Shetty and Mr.Mohit Prabhu i/b Cyril Amarchand Mangaldas for the Applicant.

Mr.Shiraz Rustomjee, Shreya Parikh and Arnav Misra i/b K.Ashar & Co. for the Respondent.

CORAM: UJJAL BHUYAN AND MADHAV JAMDAR, JJ.

DATE : 13TH SEPTEMBER, 2021.

P.C:- Heard Mr.Prakash Shah, learned Counsel for the Applicant and Mr.Shiraz Rustomjee, learned Counsel for the Respondent. 2.

This Interim Application has been filed by the Applicant i.e. 63 Moons Technologies Ltd. seeking the following prayers : "(a) Take on record the Rejoinder on behalf of the Petitioner, which is hereto annexed and marked Exhibit "A". ;

(b) Take on record the Additional Affidavit on behalf of the Petitioner, which is annexed hereto and marked as Exhibit "B"."

hcs 2/2 10.ia1866.21.doc 3.

Applicant is the Petitioner in the related Writ Petition. 4.

Regarding prayer clauses (a) and (b), it is the contention of learned Counsel for Respondent that rejoinder affidavit as well as additional affidavit filed on behalf of the Petitioner contains averments and documents which are subsequent and may not have any material bearing on the subject matter of the Writ Petition.

4.

Without entering into that aspect of the matter, we make it clear that while rejoinder affidavit and additional affidavit of the Petitioner will be taken on record, however all contentions relating thereto are kept open to be taken up at the time of final hearing.

5.

With the above direction and observations, Interim Application is disposed of.

[MADHAV JAMDAR, J.] [UJJAL BHUYAN, J.]