Pr.Commissioner Of Income Tax-10,Mumbai v. Procter And Gamble Hygiene And Healthcare Ltd

Digitally signed by MEERA MAHESH JADHAV Date:

2022.02.22 15:55:19 +0530 1/2 Production.doc MEERA MAHESH JADHAV

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.3039 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai ....Appellant V/s.

Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.

...Respondent

WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.929 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai ....Appellant V/s.

Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.

...Respondent

WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.397 OF 2021 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai ....Appellant V/s.

Procter & Gamble Hygiene & Healthcare Ltd.

...Respondent

WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.2110 OF 2019 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai ....Appellant V/s.

Prothious Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent

WITH INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.367 OF 2021 Pr. Commissioner of Income Tax-10 Mumbai ....Appellant V/s.

Prothious Engineering Services Pvt. Ltd.

...Respondent

---- Mr. Akhileshwar Sharma for Appellant in all Appeals Mr. B. S. Yewale i/b Rajesh Shah & Co. for Respondent in ITXA/3039/2019 Mr. Harsh Kapadia for Respondent in ITXA/929/2019 & ITXA/397/2021 Mr. Abhishek Tilak for Respondent in ITXA/2110/2019 & ITXA/367/2021 ---- Meera Jadhav

2/2 Production.doc CORAM : K.R. SHRIRAM & N.J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED : 21st FEBRUARY 2022 P.C. :

Not on board. Upon mentioning taken on board. Mr. Sharma states that the proposed substantial questions of law are covered by judgment of the Apex Court in Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Pepsi Foods Ltd., 1 and therefore, these appeals could be disposed. Accordingly, appeals stand disposed.

(N. J. JAMADAR, J.) (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.)

1. (2021) 126 taxmann.com 69 (SC) Meera Jadhav