Kantilal H. Gudka And Ajaykiran K. Gudka v. Retnasamy Elango And Anita Elango

Chittewan 1/1 910.CARBPL 338-17.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.338 OF 2017 Kantilal H. Gudka And Another ...

Petitioners

Versus

Retnasamy Elango And Another ...

Respondents .....

Mr. Jay Vakil i/b MDP And Partners for the Petitioners. Mr. Omar Khaiyam Shaikh for the Respondents.

.....

CORAM : S.C.GUPTE, J.

DATE : 2 AUGUST 2017 P.C. :

.

Heard learned Counsel for the parties.

This is a Commercial Arbitration Petition under Section 29-A of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. For the reasons stated in the Commercial Arbitration Petition, the mandate of the Arbitrator is extended by a period of three months from today. The Commercial Arbitration Petition is disposed of accordingly.

(S.C. GUPTE, J.)