Suresh Bansilal More v. Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board
906 to 911
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1988 OF 2016 Latabai Kashinath Khairnar ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1989 OF 2016 Shankar Rama Pawar ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1991 OF 2016 Vikas Bhimrao Fadhatare ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1992 OF 2016 Kalavati Krishna Kadam ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 1997 OF 2016 Suresh Bansilal More ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent WITH WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2146 OF 2016 Rajendra Barku Wagh ..Petitioner Vs.
Mumbai Housing And Area Development Board ..Respondent mmj
906 to 911 Mr. Akshay Shinde for the Petitioner in all the Petitions Mr. P. G. Lad for the Respondent in all the Petitions CORAM :
R. M. SAVANT, J.
DATE :
31st AUGUST, 2016 P.C.
The Petitioners in the above mentioned Petitions challenge the orders passed on various dates in February 2014 by the Deputy Chief Officer of the Mumbai Repairs and Reconstruction Board cancelling the allotment of tenaments made to the Petitioners pursuant to the lottery which was held for the said purpose. Against such orders an Appeal lies under Regulation 18(4) of the MHAD (Establishment, Management, Sell, Transfer and Exchange of Tenament) Regulations, to the Chief Executive Officer of the MHADA. The Learned Counsel Mr. Shinde appearing for the Petitioners in view of the said remedy available seeks withdrawal of the above Petitions with liberty to invoke the said remedy. The above Petitions are accordingly allowed to the withdrawn with liberty as prayed for.
Needless to state that the contentions of the parties are kept open for being urged before the Appellate Authority. Needless to state that the Appellate Authority would decide the Appeals on its own merits and in accordance with law.
[R.M.SAVANT, J] mmj