Prateek D. Rawal v. Jitendra B. Vaghadia

29-carbp-411-2017.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION PETITION NO.411 OF 2017 Prateek D. Rawal

...Petitioner

vs.

Jitendra B. Vaghadia

...Respondent

VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Ms. Gauri Sakhardande i/b. Mr. Tushar Goradia, for the Petitioner. Ms. Akanksha Mishre i/b.Solicis Lex, for the Respondent. VISHAL SUBHASH PAREKAR Date: 2022.03.21 18:37:53 +0530 CORAM :

N. J. JAMADAR, J.

DATE :

MARCH 21, 2022 P.C.:

.

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

2.

On 24th August, 2017 this Court had passed order in terms of Minutes of Order. The said order reads as under.

1. Learned Counsel for the parties have tendered minutes of order which bear the signature of the parties as also the learned Advocates for the parties. The same are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. The undertakings as recorded in the minutes of order are accepted. Learned Counsel for the parties submits that the parties are present in Court and they are identified by their advocates.

2. Order in terms of the minutes of order. Accordingly, stand over to 5 January 2018.

3.

The learned counsel, on instruction of the petitioner, submits that the respondent has complied with the undertakings recorded in the Minutes of Order. The learned counsel further submits that the petition has served its purpose.

4.

In view of the aforesaid statement, petition stands disposed. (N. J. JAMADAR, J.) Vishal Parekar, P.A.

...1