The Commissioner Of Cgst And Central Excise, Navi Mumbai Commissionerate v. Hindustant Petroleum Corporation Ltd.

Uday S. Jagtap 572-18-NMA-11=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 572 OF 2018 IN CENTRAL EXCISE APPEAL (L) NO. 157 OF 2018 The Commissioner of CGST & CE Navi Mumbai .. Applicant In the matter between The Commissioner of CGST & CE Navi Mumbai .. Appellant v/s.

M/s. HPCL ..Respondent Mr. Sham Walve a/w Mr. Ram Ochani for the applicant / orig. appellant Ms. Padmavati Patil for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.J.

DATED : 4th OCTOBER, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This application has been taken out for condonation of 47 days delay in filing the accompanying the appeal from the order dated 10th August, 2017 passed by the Customs, Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal.

2.

We have perused the affidavit in support of the motion filed by Mr. Sudhakar Pandey, Assistant Commissioner of CGST and CE, Navi Uday Shivaji Jagtap Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.10.05 17:48:13 +0530

Uday S. Jagtap 572-18-NMA-11=.doc Mumbai, dated 4th June, 2018 and are satisfied with the reasons stated therein for condonation of delay in filing the appeal. 3.

In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clause (a).

(RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)