Ashutosh Y. Maneklal v. Lina Y. Maneklal And 7 ORS.

kvm 1/2 27-CHS797.14

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION CHAMBER SUMMONS NO. 797 OF 2014 IN NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 815 OF 2014 IN SUIT NO. 2546 OF 2012 Ashutosh Y. Maneklal ..... Applicant/ Plaintiff

VERSUS

Lina Y. Maneklal & Ors.

..... Defendants Mr.Anosh Siqueria, i/b. Mr.Robin Fernandes for the Applicant/Plaintiff.

Ms.Veena Advani for the Defendant no.1.

Mr.Ashwin Poojari, I/b. Vimadalal & Co. for the Defendant no.2. Mr.R.Y.Sirsikar, a/w. Mr.Dadasaheb Shingade for the MCGM. CORAM :

R.D. DHANUKA, J.

DATE :

26th NOVEMBER, 2018 P.C.

Learned counsel appearing for the applicant states that the defendant no.2 has already provided inspection of the documents setout in the Schedule appended to the chamber summons. Statement is accepted. In view of the statement, nothing survives in this chamber summons. Chamber summons is disposed of as infructuous. No order as to costs.

2.

Learned counsel appearing for the defendant no.2 on instruction

kvm 2/2 27-CHS797.14 states that the certified copy of the said family settlement duly certified by the learned advocate for the defendant no.2 would be furnished to the applicant's advocate within one week from today. Statement is accepted.

3.

Learned counsel appearing for the defendant no.2 on instruction states that the documents relied upon by his client in the affidavit dated 2nd May,2014 in support of the Notice of Motion No.815 of 2014 is the only family settlement his client relying upon. He is not referring to any other family settlement. Statement is accepted. [R.D. DHANUKA, J.]