← Library
Bombay High CourtTS/104/2013consent term

Sunanda Sakharam More @ Rulhmini Sakharam More v. Aruna Rakesh Sonawane And ANR.

2015-03-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice G.S. Patel2 pages

905-TS-104-13.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 104 OF 2013 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 963 OF 2012 Sunanda Sakharam More @ Rulhmini Sakharam More ...Plaintiff

Versus

Aruna Rakesh Sonawane & Anr.

...Defendants Ms. Sunita Perumal, i/b Mr. Savin Masurkar, for the Plaintiff. Mrs. F. D. Contractor, for the Defendants.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

11th March 2015 PC:- 1.

Consent terms are tendered in this suit. These are signed by the Advocates for the parties. Sunanda S. More and Mrs. Alpana More have affixed their right hand thumb impression to these Consent Terms. Mrs. Aruna More appears to have signed in Devanagari. The original Consent Terms contain a specific endorsement that those who have signed or affixed their thumb impressions have been identified and that the Consent Terms have been interpreted and explained to them. All three, i.e., Sunanda

905-TS-104-13.DOC More, Alpana More and Aruna More are personally present in Court and are identified before me by the learned Advocates. The Consent Terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

2.

The suit and the petition both are disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms. Refund of court fees, in accordance with the Rules. All concerned to act on an authenticated copy of this order. Drawn up decree is dispensed with.

(G. S. PATEL, J.)