← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2331/2017

Ashok Ramchandra Warse v. State Of Maharashtra And 2 ORS

2017-10-10Hon'Ble Shri Justice G. S. Kulkarni,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Shantanu S. Kemkar2 pages

hvn 904-wp-2331.2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2331 OF 2017 Ashok Ramchandra Warse ... Petitioners

Versus

State of Maharashtra ... Respondent Dr.Milind Sathe a/w Ms. Mallika a/w Ms. Sanchita Sridhar for the petitioners.

Mr. Hemant Haryan, AGP for respondent no.1 State. Ms. Vrushali Maindad i/by Abhijeet A. Desai for respondent no. 2. CORAM : SHANTANU KEMKAR & G.S.KULKARNI, JJ.

OCTOBOER 10, 2017 P.C.:

Parties through their counsel.

2.

Through this petition, the petitioner is seeking direction to respondent no. 2 to consider and take appropriate decision on the petitioner's proposal/application dated 17.1.2015 Exhibit.C-1. 3.

According to the petitioner, the said proposal/application was considered by respondent no. 2 but instead of taking decision at its own, after making some comments on the said proposal/application, the matter was referred by the respondent no. 2 to the State Government.

4.

Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in reply to

hvn 904-wp-2331.2017 the letter dated 18.12.2015 sent by the respondent no.2 SRA to the State Government, the State Government vide its letter dated 15.02.2016 has directed the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's application at its own as according to the State Government, the decision is required to be taken by respondent no. 2 as it is within its jurisdiction to take appropriate decision under section 3C of the Slums Act.

5.

Learned counsel for respondent no.2 on instructions submits that appropriate decision in accordance with law shall be taken by respondent no.2 in regard to the petitioner''s application/proposal as expeditiously as possible. 6.

Keeping in view the aforesaid, we dispose of this petition by directing the respondent no.2 to decide the petitioner's application/proposal dated 17.1.2015 in accordance with law as expeditiously as possible preferably within eight weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order.

7.

With the aforesaid directions, Petition is disposed of. (G.S. KULKARNI, J.) (SHANTANU S. KEMKAR, J.)