Janki Suresh Bhandoola v. Ramesh Parsani And ANR

39-NMT168-18.DOC Shephali

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 168 OF 2018 IN TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 50 OF 2005 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 3 OF 2005 Janki Suresh Bhandoola ...Plaintiff

Versus

Ramesh Parsani & Anr ...Defendants Mr Nishitha Malik, for the Plaintiff.

Ms Shivani Soni, I/b Deven Dwarkadas & Partners, for the Applicant/Defendant.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

4th September 2018 PC:- 1.

In view of the settled law on the subject, 1 this Motion does not lie.

Rupali Mehta v Tina Narinder Sain Mehta, AIR 2007 Bom 62 : 2006 (6) ALL MR 48 : 2006 (6) Bom CR 778 : 2006 (6) Mh LJ 786; Ramchandra Ganpatrao Hande alias Handege v Vithalrao Hande & Ors, AIR 2011 Bom 136 : 2011 (4) ALL MR 189 : 2011 (4) Bom CR 326 : 2011 (113) Bom LR 1302 : 2011 (4) Mh LJ 50; Manek Dara Sukhadwalla v Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer (DB), MANU/MH/1252/2014; Shernaz Faroukh Lawyer & Anr v Manek Dara Sukhadwalla and Anr; 2015 (2) ALL MR 233 : 2014 (2) Bom CR 591 : 2015 (2) MhLJ 917; Lydia Agnes Rodriques née D'Cunha & Ors v Joseph Anthony D'Cunha & Ors, 2014 (2) ALLMR 873 : 2014 (1) Bom CR 811 : 2014 (3) Mh LJ 508.

4th September 2018

39-NMT168-18.DOC 2.

The Motion is dismissed with liberty to the Applicant to file appropriate proceedings for the same relief.

(G. S. PATEL, J) 4th September 2018