Hathway Investments Pvt. Ltd. v. The Additional Commissioner Of Income Tax Special Range 50
(5)-ITXA-1640-17.doc.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION Balaji G.
Panchal INCOME TAX APPEAL NO.1640 OF 2017 by Balaji G.
Panchal Date: 2021.01.20 15:05:39 +0530 Hathway Investments Private Limited ..Appellant
Versus
Additional Commissioner of Income-tax ..Respondent Ms. Tasneem Zaveri i/by Kanga & Co., for the Appellant. Mr. Sham Walve, for the Respondent.
CORAM : UJJAL BHUYAN & MILIND N. JADHAV, JJ.
DATE : 19th JANUARY, 2021 P.C.
Heard Ms. Tasneem Zaveri, learned counsel for the appellant and Mr. Sham Walve, learned standing counsel revenue for the respondent. 2.
This appeal has been preferred by the assessee as the appellant under section 260A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 against the order dated 01.02.2017 passed by the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal, "I" Bench, Mumbai in ITA No.6531/Mum/2003 for the assessment year 1998-99. 3.
The appeal is pending for admission.
4.
The appeal is before us today on praecipe filed by learned counsel for the appellant.
5.
It is stated that Parliament has enacted the Direct Tax Vivad se Vishwas Act, 2020 providing for a scheme for resolution of tax disputes. In terms thereof, appellant has filed declaration under section 3 before the BGP.
(5)-ITXA-1640-17.doc.
designated authority. Designated authority issued certificate under section 5(1). For passing of the final order under section 5(2), appellant is required to withdraw the appeal under section 4(3) and to furnish proof of withdrawal along with intimation of payment, if any, to the designated authority. Hence, prayer for withdrawal of the appeal. 6.
Learned counsel for the respondent has no objection to the prayer made.
7.
Having regard to the above, we allow withdrawal of the appeal. 8.
Appeal is accordingly disposed of as withdrawn. 9.
Refund as per rules.
10.
this Court. All concerned will act on production by fax or email of a MILIND N. JADHAV, J UJJAL BHUYAN, J BGP.