← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2377/2017disposed off

Sudhir V. Sadavarte v. Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And 3 ORS.

2017-10-11Hon'Ble Shri Justice R. I. Chagla,Hon'Ble Smt. Justice Vasanti A. Naik2 pages

3-WP-2377-2017.DOC Jsn

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 2377 OF 2017 Shri Sudhir V. Sadavarte ... Petitioner

Versus

Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai & Ors

...Respondents

Mr. Joel J. Carlos, for Petitioner.

Mr. Himanshu Takke, AGP.

Ms. Vandana Mahadik for MCGM.

Mr. Kiran Kumar Annamwar, Assistant Engineer "G" North ward is present.

CORAM:

SMT. VASANTI A NAIK AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATED:

11th OCTOBER 2017 PC:- Heard. By this writ petition, the petitioner seeks a direction against the respondent nos. 1 and 2 to take action for the demolition of the unauthorised construction of toilet blocks just behind the flat possessed by the petitioner in the housing society. Ms. Mahadik, the learned counsel for the Corporation states that since the construction was found to be illegal, notices were served on the respondent no.4 for the demolition of the construction. It is stated that since the respondent no.4 has not demolished the construction, till date, the Corporation would take steps for demolishing the same. The learned counsel states on instructions from Mr. Kiran Kumar Annamwar, Assistant Engineer, B & F, G/N who is present in the Court that, the unauthorised construction would be demolished within one month. 1/2

3-WP-2377-2017.DOC On the statement made by the learned counsel for the Corporation, grievance of the petitioner should stand redressed. Hence, by accepting the statement made on behalf of the Corporation, which would be binding on the Corporation, we dispose of the writ petition with no order as to costs. ( RIYAZ I. CHAGLA J. ) ( SMT. VASANTI A NAIK, J. ) 2/2