Girish Raut v. Commissioner Municipal Corporation Of Greater Mumbai And ANR

1/2 PILL 75 of 2016 Vat

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (L) No. 75 OF 2016 Girish Raut ....Petitioner Vs.

MCGM Mumbai and Anr.

....Respondents ****** None for the Petitioner None for the Respondents ****** CORAM : V. M. KANADE & M.S. SONAK, JJ.

DATE : AUGUST 8, 2016 P.C. :

1.

None appears on behalf of the Petitioner and the Respondents. 2.

The grievance of the Petitioner is that the reservation ground, which is earmarked as "recreation", is misused for car parking, marriage ceremonies and other such kinds of celebrations and functions. 3.

We have perused the PIL. It appears that no representation has been made by the Petitioner before the concerned authorities, before filing this PIL. We, therefore, direct Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 to consider

2/2 PILL 75 of 2016 this PIL as representation of the Petitioner and decide the same within eight weeks, on merits and in accordance with law. The Petitioner shall submit a copy of the PIL to Respondent Nos.1 and 2 within two weeks. PIL is accordingly disposed of.

M.S. SONAK, J.

V.M. KANADE, J.

Vaishali Tikam