The Commissioner Of Income Tax - Tds -1 v. Group M Media Pvt Ltd

Uday S. Jagtap 545-18-NMA-13=.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 545 OF 2018 IN INCOME TAX APPEAL (L) NO. 589 OF 2016 Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS-1 .. Applicant In the matter between Commissioner of Income Tax-TDS-1 .. Appellant v/s.

Group M Media Pvt. Ltd.

..Respondent Mr. Suresh Kumar for the applicant / orig. appellant Mr. Abhishek Tilak for the respondent CORAM : M.S. SANKLECHA & SANDEEP K. SHINDE, J.J.

DATED : 10th AUGUST, 2018.

P.C.

1.

This application has been taken out for condonation of 626 days delay in taking out this motion for setting aside the order dated 1st September, 2016 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master, rejecting the Revenue's appeal for non-removal of office objection. The above rejection of the appeal was under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules.

Uday Shivaji Jagtap Digitally signed by Uday Shivaji Jagtap Date:

2018.08.13 11:20:52 +0530

Uday S. Jagtap 545-18-NMA-13=.doc 2.

Mr. Tilak, learned Counsel appearing for the respondent, on instructions, states that it has no objection if the delay is condoned and the order dated 1st September, 2016 passed by the Prothonotary and Senior Master under Rule 986 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules is set aside.

3.

In the above view, the Notice of Motion is allowed in terms of prayer clauses (a) and (b).

4.

Needless to mention that if the office objections are not removed within a period of four weeks from today, the appeal itself would stand dismissed without further reference to the Court. (SANDEEP K. SHINDE J.) (M.S. SANKLECHA, J.)