Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. And ANR. v. Murmansk Shipping Co.

1/1 11.CHSCD-827-2018.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION IN ITS COMMERCIAL DIVISION COMMERCIAL CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.827 OF 2018 WITH COMMERCIAL CHAMBER SUMMONS NO.832 OF 2018 IN COMMERCIAL SUIT NO.258 OF 2015 Adani Power Rajasthan Ltd. and Anr.

....Applicants/Plaintiffs Vs.

Murmansk Shipping Company Limited ....Defendant ---- Mr. Rahul Narichania, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Ruchir Goenka I/b. Bose and Mitra and Co. for applicant/plaintiff in both chamber summons. Mr. Bimal Rajasekhar for defendant.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 1st JULY 2019 P.C.:

Mr. Rajasekhar, counsel for defendant states that both the chamber summons can be allowed for the relief as prayed for. Therefore, both the chamber summons are allowed and accordingly disposed in terms of prayer clause - (a). All rights and contentions of defendant, including defendant's right to challenge admissibility of any document or to cross examine the witness, are kept open.

(K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad