Novarties India Limited v. The Deputy Commissioner Of Wealth Tax

904-907-WTXA1417-2007+.DOC Santosh

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 1390 OF 2007 Novartis India Limited (Earlier known as Hindustan Ciba-Giegy Limited) ...Appellant

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Circle 7 (1), Mumbai

...Respondent

AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 1417 OF 2007 Novartis India Limited (Earlier known as Hindustan Ciba-Giegy Limited) ...Appellant

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth-tax, Circle 7 (1), Mumbai

...Respondent

AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 1532 OF 2007 Novartis India Limited (Earlier known as Hindustan Ciba-Giegy Limited) ...Appellant

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth-tax

...Respondent

AND WEALTH TAX APPEAL NO. 1534 OF 2007 Novartis India Limited (Earlier known as Hindustan Ciba-Giegy Limited) ...Appellant

Versus

The Deputy Commissioner of Wealth-tax

...Respondent

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Mr. B. D. Damodar, i/b Kanga & Co., for the Appellant. Mr. Suresh Kumar, for the Respondent.

SANTOSH SUBHASH KULKARNI Date: 2022.02.28 16:08:15 +0530

CORAM:

K. R. SHRIRAM & N. J. JAMADAR, JJ DATED:

26th FEBRUARY, 2022 1/2

904-907-WTXA1417-2007+.DOC PC:- 1.

Mr. Damodar states that the issues involved are under the Wealth Tax Act and Urban Land Ceiling Act, both of which have been repealed. The amount involved also is very less, which could probably be not enough to justify the legal expenses to be incurred. Therefore, Mr. Damodar, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the appeals.

2.

Appeals dismissed as withdrawn.

3.

Refund of Court-fees, if any, in accordance with the Rule. [N. J. JAMADAR, J.] [K. R. SHRIRAM, J.] 2/2