Manoj Nathumal Shah And 2 ORS. v. The Municipal Coporation Of Greater Mumbai And 12 ORS.

SKN 1/1 44.18-rpwl.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION REVIEW PETITION (LDG.) NO. 44 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 2117 OF 2014 Manoaj Nautamlal Shah and others.

...

Petitioners.

V/s.

The Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai and others.

...

Respondents.

Mr.V.Y.Sanglikar with Vyom Shah, Mr.Sachin Mahagaonkar, Mr.Darshit Shah and Mr.Jimish Shah i/b. Divya Shah Associates for the petitioners. Ms.Pallavi Thakar for the respondent- MMC.

Mr.Shyam Singh i/b. Mr.P.J.Thorat for respondent Nos8 and 11. by Sanjay Kashinath Nanoskar Date:

2018.07.27 13:32:10 +0530 Sanjay Kashinath Nanoskar CORAM :

A.S.OKA AND RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, JJ.

DATE :

24th July 2018.

P.C.:

Not on board. Taken up on board.

2.

Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner. For the reasons recorded in the order dated 3rd July 2018, this Court has declined to exercise its discretionary writ jurisdiction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. Considering the discretion exercised by the Court, there is no error apparent on the face of record. Even otherwise, there is no ground for review. The review petition is dismissed. (RIYAZ I. CHAGLA, J.) (A.S.OKA, J.)