Seamec Ltd. v. Union Of India And 3 ORS.

923-WPL.2470.2018.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION (L) NO. 2470 OF 2018 Seamec Ltd.

} Petitioner versus Union of India and Ors.

} Respondents WITH CUSTOMS APPEAL (L) NO. 40 OF 2018 WITH NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 554 OF 2018 AND NOTICE OF MOTION (L) NO. 511 OF 2018 Mr. Raifque Dada-Senior Advocate with Mr. Jitendra Motwani and Ms. Nehal Parekh i/b. M/s. Economic Laws Practice for the petitioner.

Mr. Pradeep S. Jetly for the respondents (absent).

CORAM :- S. C. DHARMADHIKARI & SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, JJ.

DATE :- AUGUST 7, 2018 P.C. :- 1.

When this writ petition was placed for passing orders, on instructions, Mr. Rafique Dada learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioner states that the petitioner does not intend to press this petition. They would explore the possibility of taking the vessel for dry docking within India. In the light of such instructions, the petition is disposed of as not pressed. J.V.Salunke,PA

923-WPL.2470.2018.doc 2.

Insofar as the customs appeal is concerned, let it be placed together with the motions, for admission, as per its turn. (SMT. BHARATI H. DANGRE, J.) (S.C.DHARMADHIKARI, J.) by Jayant Vishwanath Salunke Date: 2018.08.09 19:14:04 +0530 Jayant Vishwanath Salunke J.V.Salunke,PA