Himatlal G. Kachhara (Huf) And 3 ORS v. Sunil Jain

910-ARBPL922-19-MODIFIED.DOC Arun

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO. 922 OF 2019 Himatlal G Kachhara (HUF) & Ors

...Petitioners

Versus

Sunil Jain

...Respondent

Mr Vikramjit Garewal, with B Vaidya, i/b Kanga & Co, for the Petitioners.

Mr Sanjeev Singh, for the Respondent.

CORAM:

G.S. PATEL, J.

DATED:

31st January 2020 PC:- 1.

The disputes between the parties are settled. Consent Terms SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE are tendered. These are signed by all the Petitioners and the Respondent and their respective Advocates. The Consent Terms are SHEPHALI SANJAY MORMARE Date: 2022.03.17 17:59:31 +0530 taken on record and marked "M1" for identification with today's date. The Consent Terms are in order. They have been drawn up by the parties of their own volition in reflection of their true intentions. The undertakings in the Consent Terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

2.

The Arbitration Petition is disposed of in accordance with the Consent Terms.

31st January 2020

910-ARBPL922-19-MODIFIED.DOC 3.

A soft copy of the Consent Terms will be uploaded as second order in the matter.

(G. S. PATEL, J) Note:

This order is modified as per order dated 17th March 2022. The corrections are shown in bold and italics.

31st January 2020