Rajan Naik v. Sharad R. Urankar And 5 ORS.

17-s-3579-2006 rrpillai

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 1415 OF 2017 IN SUIT NO. 3579 OF 2006 Rajan Naik Plaintiff vs.

Sharad R. Urankar and 5 Ors.

Defendants WITH CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 28 OF 2010 CHAMBER SUMMONS (L) NO. 420 OF 2016 NOTICE OF MOTION NO. 4532 OF 2006 IN SUIT NO. 3579 OF 2006 Mr. Ashok T. Gade for the plaintiff.

Mr. Vishal Kanade a/w. Ms. Ankita Gadkari for the Defendant nos. 2 to 4. CORAM : A.K. MENON, J.

th SEPTEMBER, 2018 DATE : 19 P.C.

1.

By this Notice of motion the plaintiff seeks restoration of contempt petition no. 28 of 2010. It is stated that Chamber Summons(L) No. 420 of 2016 has already been allowed. In the circumstances, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the notice of motion may be allowed so that contempt petition may be taken up for hearing.

17-s-3579-2006 2.

Having heard learned counsel for the parties and considering the reasons given in the affidavit in support of the Chamber summons, I am of the view that the Chamber Summons deserves to be allowed. Accordingly, I pass the following order : (i) Notice of Motion is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (a). (ii) Contempt petition no. 28 of 2010 is restored to filed and to be listed on th October, 2018.

(A.K. MENON, J.) by Rajeshwari Ramesh Pillai Date:

2018.09.25 10:58:51 +0530 Rajeshwari Ramesh Pillai