Surjit Singh Mahal, Sikh v. Angad Singh Mahal

920-TS103-14.DOC Agk

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION TESTAMENTARY SUIT NO. 103 OF 2014 IN TESTAMENTARY PETITION NO. 1453 OF 2013 Surjit Singh Mahal ...Plaintiff

Versus

Angad Singh Mahal ...Defendant Mr. Rushabh Seth, i/b M/s. M.S. Bodhanwala & Co., for the Plaintiff.

Mr. Milind Prabhune, i/b Anil Jakatdar, for the Defendant.

CORAM: G.S. PATEL, J DATED:

16th June 2015 PC:- 1.

The disputes have been settled. Consent terms are tendered. These are signed by the Plaintiff and the Defendant/Caveator and their respective Advocates. Both parties are present in Court. Both parties confirm in the Court that they have seen and accepted the contents of the consent terms. The consent terms are taken on record and marked "X" for identification. Undertakings in the consent terms are accepted as undertakings to the Court.

920-TS103-14.DOC 2.

Testamentary Suit No. 103 of 2014 is disposed of in accordance with the consent terms. As provided in Clause (4) of the consent terms, probate is to be issued.

3.

Department to act on an authenticated copy of this order. (G. S. PATEL, J.)