Union Of India And ANR. v. Janu Govind Rohane

23. wp 1418.13.doc Urmila Ingale

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 1418 OF 2013 Union of India and or.

.. Petitioners Vs.

Janu Govind Rohane .. Respondent Mr.Rui Rodrigues a/w Ms.Lata Patne i/b Mr.Vinod Joshi, for the Petitioners.

Mr.Ramesh Ramamurthy & Mr.Saikumar Ramamurthy, for Respondent.

CORAM : SMT. V.K.TAHILRAMANI ACTING C.J.

AND M.S.KARNIK, J.

DATE : 31st JANUARY, 2018 P.C. :

Heard.

Learned Counsel for the petitioners states on instructions that the order passed by the Central Administrative Tribunal (for short 'Tribunal') is already complied with. Our attention is invited to the documents filed by the petitioners in their additional affidavit which clearly mentions that the order 1/2

23. wp 1418.13.doc passed by the Tribunal is complied with. Learned Counsel for the petitioners therefore submits that the present Petition is rendered infructuous. The Petition is accordingly dismissed as infructuous. No order as to costs.

(M.S.KARNIK, J.) (ACTING CHIEF JUSTICE) 2/2