Laljibhai Goardhan Mistry v. Chandrakant @ Chandubhaijivan Kalelia And ANR.

1/2 45@46.EXA-64-2011.doc

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

ORDINARY AND ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2011 Smt. Sumangla Purushotam Damle ....Applicant Vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhaijivan Kalelia and Anr. ....Respondents WITH EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2011 Laljibhai Goardhan Mistry ....Applicant Vs.

Chandrakant @ Chandubhaijivan Kalelia and Anr. ....Respondents ---- Mr. Jay Yadav I/b. J.R. Vakil and Associates for applicant/claimant in both execution applications.

None for respondents.

---- CORAM : K.R.SHRIRAM, J.

DATE : 25th JANUARY 2019 P.C.:

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.64 OF 2011 On 11th January 2019, the following order was passed :

1. Ms. Iyer seeks further time to take steps in the execution application and the reason given is "we lost track of the matter".

2. First of all, applicants/claimants have not taken any steps for almost 7 to 8 years from the date of presentation and therefore, the registry has placed these applications for dismissal under Rule 329 of the Bombay High Court (O.S.) Rules, 1980.

3. Purely by way of indulgence, time granted upto 25th January 2019. The advocate shall file an affidavit before the next date to state what steps have been taken.

4. Stand over to 25th January 2019.

Mr. Yadav, counsel for applicant/claimant states that no affidavit as directed by this Court has been filed. Gauri Gaekwad

2/2 45@46.EXA-64-2011.doc Therefore, execution application dismissed.

EXECUTION APPLICATION NO.65 OF 2011 Mr. Yadav, counsel for applicant/claimant seeks leave to withdraw the execution application.

Execution application dismissed as withdrawn. (K.R. SHRIRAM, J.) Gauri Gaekwad